now take tot rapists for example
No, let’s just call it molestation
Naaaw, let’s just say Catholic priests
have been guilty of child abuse…
could be anything –
even a tender slap on the wrists
for not knowing the oblative in Latin, say
Hey, wait a minute. We could go one better: give it Latin standing:
say they are guilty of pedophilia
Almost excuses the bastards, doesn’t it !
This then is how it is done
and it is done by order from on high
nation-[and subsequently world-]wide
and it is done to control those
might go looting and burning churches –
No. Hold on here. Isn’t that another technique ?
The scare tactic?
Keep them afraid of everything
from aspirin to alien invasion
not to mention weapons of mass destruction – immediately redubbed WMDs
so everyone who uses that lingo can feel proud that he sounds
like he’s “in the know”
So, we went from child rapist to pedophile which, by
etymology, means a lover of children – adds a touch of irony
to the proceeedings, don’t you think?
However CHILD RAPIST might make its return into the language
…if a term was needed in a smear campaign…
you know, if they could pin nothing on some bloke
they could always ruin his reputation
by suggesting he was suspected
of raping his neighbour’s retarded child.
So much for that candidate, eh?
Next week: How the pope threatened excommunication [also known as hell fire
throughout eternity] for anyone in the church who shot his mouth off about CENTURIES
of, ahem, child abuse performed by the ordained…on every continent.